• Video
  • Audio
  • About
  • Blog
    • Published Work
    • Instructional Stuff
      • Audio Instruction
      • Music Business
      • Music Instruments
      • Music Genres
      • Programming And Such
    • Music Thoughts, Rants, Randomness
    • Production And Song Stories
  • Store
  • Contact
  •  

Monthly Archives: June 2021

Gift Giving For People Who Love Recordists

June 29, 2021 by Aaron
Music Thoughts, Rants, Randomness, Published Work, Recording Magazine
aaron j. trumm, aaron trumm, do it yourself recording, gift giving, gifts for musicians, home recording, nquit music, presents for musicians, professional audio, professional music, recording, recording magazine

This article first appeared in Recording Magazine. I reprint it here with permission, and I encourage you to subscribe to that publication, as they are a stand up bunch of folk!

When I was 16 years old, my mother bought me a 4 Track Tascam Portastudio – the kind with the cassette tape (yes I’m that old).  She did it so I would stop commandeering her dual well cassette deck to make pause loop tapes.  Ignoring for a moment the slippery path she set me on, the plan didn’t even work.  Quickly I learned, and she learned with me, that I would still need to “borrow” that stereo deck to mix down my creations.  I used that Portastudio, and that “mixdown” deck, for a surprisingly short time before more “things” were “needed” and quickly things ballooned past anyone’s ability to surprise me with studio presents.  I think that Portastudio may have been the last piece of studio gear my family attempted to buy.

The point is, it’s DIFFICULT to give gifts to a recording enthusiast and as recording enthusiasts we should pity our loved ones.

First of all, let’s not pretend what we do is even remotely accessible without money.  Recording gear is expensive, and there’s no way around it.  Sure, a person can cruise E-Bay and probably find an SM57 for around $60 but unless their recordist is new or relatively mic-snobby, there will already be a glut of 57’s in their possession.  So the loved one is faced with “the person who has everything” syndrome for anything even remotely affordable.  Guitar tuner?  “I’ve got two.”  Mic stands?  “20.” Little adapter thingies?  “Drawers full.”  If the family knows about it, we’ve probably got it in spades.

Alas, the family’s gift giving woes don’t end there.  If your doting loved one decides to spend a little more, they have to know what to get, where to get it, and which brand to go with.  And do they?  Of course not!  You must understand, dear recording guru of the neighborhood, to normal folk, your little room looks like a lost Star Trek episode.  Knobs, buttons, neon lights, wires, inexplicable wall coverings, floor gadgets, desk gadgets, lava lamps if you’re old enough, razor blades and reels if you’re awesome enough, and the darkness – oh the darkness!  Even a seasoned veteran would have trouble navigating your highly customized studio scenario, admit it!  How is Aunt Maggie supposed to know what’s missing in this quagmire, or what you have been hoping for?

Well, you could tell them.  You could say “for Christmas, I would like a Manley Tube Pre”, and your Uncle Dave might ask why you want to be stuck in a tube and what it needs to be manly for anyway.  Your spouse might Google it, but then you’d spend your evening in the ER treating sticker shock.  You could be less specific, but then you’ve doomed your loved one to a year of research and looking lost in music stores.  You might say, “I need a new set of monitors,” but that’s really just a mean thing to say to someone you like!  Heck, even YOU don’t know which pair you want!

They could just take a risk, go to a store and pick something up they think matches the look and feel of your space, and that works just fine if the store has a great return policy.

But let’s face it, it’s kind of awkward when a bass player gets a guitar as a gift.  “Yes…yes I see that it has even more strings…uhm…yes…that’s wonderful.  Yeah, more…more notes.  Thank you.”  Ok, that scenario may be a bit hyperbolic, but you get the gist.  It may be, even, that your family DOES know the difference between a Fender and a Martin, and in fact, you may even be shacked up with a fellow recordist.  If so, your gift giving woes may be less severe, however there is another problem there.  If you happen to live with a recordist, how do you know that the presents they give aren’t really for THEM?  In this situation, I advise continual and open sharing!

If you’re like most of us, and the lone recording artist in the family, it’s clear you’re not likely to wake up on your birthday to a balanced patch bay with a bow, and you’re probably never going to find a power conditioner under the tree.  But don’t be disappointed.  Have compassion for the trouble you’ve caused your people by being a genius of sound and audio.  Love them anyway, and ask for little.  Try, if you can, to understand what they want for presents (even though wanting anything that doesn’t go in a studio does seem insane) and you be the giver.  Remember also that you are probably no better at gift giving, seeing as how you tend to give earplugs as stocking stuffers and surround sound for your anniversary.

There may even come a day when your stocking is full of XLR cables, or each day of Chanukah has a different color Y cable but be patient.  Until that day, when holidays, birthdays or anniversaries roll around, smile, say thank you, give big hugs…

… and use E-Bay to sell your gifts and get more gear!

Happy shopping!

I mostly do my own studio purchasing and I’m trying to be a better gift giver.  If you want to exchange gifts with me, reach out on my socials… @AaronJTrumm on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.

The Evolution Of Evolutionary Mixing

June 22, 2021 by Aaron
Music Thoughts, Rants, Randomness, Published Work, Recording Magazine
aaron j. trumm, aaron trumm, audio mixing, do it yourself recording, home recording, mixing, music mixing, nquit music, professional audio, professional music, recording, recording magazine

This article first appeared in Recording Magazine. I reprint it here with permission, and I encourage you to subscribe to that publication, as they are a stand up bunch of folk!

The modern recording process has been set for quite a while.  It goes:

  1. Pre-Production (writing/rehearsing, etc.)
  2. Tracking
  3. Mixing
  4. Mastering

Keeping  these processes separate and distinct has its advantages.  For example, a well written song composed, arranged and rehearsed is usually tracked smoothly, with fewer problems than ill-conceived ideas, even with non-traditional music like electronica.  Well arranged songs also lend themselves to easier mixing.  Mastering, meanwhile, needs to be its own process, with new ears and different gear, and of course getting a break from long tracking sessions and coming back fresh for mixdown can not only be more effective, but more fun and rewarding too.

The process has proven effective, but in the past 5-10 years, I’ve noticed a new paradigm developing for many musicians and producers, myself included.

In traditional mixdown, we bring recorded, edited final tracks to a mix studio, call up the tracks on tape, MDM or DAW and use a console and outboard processing to create the final mix.  We move faders, dial knobs, make patches, and if our console isn’t automated (ie: the ubiquitous Mackie 8-Buss), rehearse and perform moves and changes in real time, sometimes working in teams (“move over, Bob! I have to twist the mid-range NOW to create that EQ wahwah! Make sure you fade channel 2 while I engage the delay…”) 

These are often one shot sessions, with hours of listening on multiple monitors, boom boxes, computer speakers and car stereos to achieve translatable mixes.  This works, but what if you make a mistake, or find out the mix is too boomy in Walmart?  Can you recreate that session?  Do you have the time and money to rebook?  You can attempt to recreate an analog session, but it is painful and rarely works (remember the knob/fader sheets that came in 8-Buss manuals?).

Of course, DAWS and automated boards make it easier.  A ProTools mix can be called up again and again, sounding exactly the same, especially if no outboard gear is involved, and an automated console can do the same.  However even an inexpensive digital board sits in a single (expensive) room and so does a hefty ProTools rig, so there wasn’t necessarily a huge change to the process when digital boomed.

However, when laptops got powerful enough to handle multi-track audio, there was a bigger shift.  In my own work, that shift was immediate and dramatic.  Suddenly mixes could evolve over time.  I could take the laptop everywhere, checking mixes and making small tweaks in video edit suites, project studios, theaters, houses or strange headphones.  Add mp3s and stronger internet, and suddenly I was sharing evolving mixes with band members or label partners remotely, reading emailed feedback and correcting mixes while at coffee shops or on planes.  Not only was there no longer a time crunch every session, I was listening in different ENVIRONMENTS, which is great for translatability.  The result was lower cost and better mixes.

That change in process levels the playing field a bit, giving more artists another way to strive for world class material; but it can also change the fundamental recording process.  With the ability to quickly tweak and change mix parameters (and save old versions), dialing in the sound can start earlier in the chain.  Mixes can evolve with the writing, which is great for genres where the mix is a fundamental part of the composition itself, and while it can certainly be a double edged sword, if managed right, it can also lead to a more integrated and rewarding experience over all, and sometimes even to smooth as butter traditional mixdown and mastering sessions later in the process.  Not to mention, there is a new sense of freedom there that wasn’t there before, and we artists do love our sense of freedom.

I like to call it “evolutionary mixing”.  I wouldn’t call it a replacement for the traditional workflow.  As I said, there are reasons that workflow developed, and some of the freedom afforded with a new outlook can be problematic.  Mixing while writing and tracking can cause a loss of perspective, for example, and sometimes easier processes foster laziness.  There’s also plenty of reason to hire and learn from masters of the trade.  Having a laptop and an attitude is great, but taking that material back to an old master can really create that earth shaking sense of bridging past, present and future.

Personally, I still do my best to compose complete pieces first before doing much tracking, I’m adamant about hiring a world class mastering house, and on my next project, I’ll be combining the evolutionary mixing approach during tracking and editing to put my creative spin on things with a more traditional mixdown later in the process done by a whole different (better) engineer.

That all said, it is exciting to see technology changing the process in a way that increases access and creates new art and inspiration, not only for up and comers, but also for salty veterans who may need a kick in the pants.  After all, new process: new result.

I’ve been searching for a good mix for 27 years. Most of the best ones have evolved over a little time. I’m currently outside…in fact I just took the picture at the top of this… talk to me about this and other music, creativity, and outside related things on my socials… @AaronJTrumm on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.

The Importance of Going Outside

June 15, 2021 by Aaron
Music Thoughts, Rants, Randomness, Published Work, Recording Magazine
aaron j. trumm, aaron trumm, do it yourself recording, health, home recording, nquit music, professional audio, professional music, recording, recording magazine, work life balance, work/life balance

This article first appeared in Recording Magazine. I reprint it here with permission, and I encourage you to subscribe to that publication, as they are a stand up bunch of folk!

I was talking to a friend on Twitter (ironic start to this I know), and he sent me a picture of a beautiful lake.  We got to talking about that lake, and how his habit was to take long walks around it.  I said I thought it was important to go outside as much as possible, and he agreed.  I told him there was a similar (former) lake outside my department in grad school, and that I’d head out there whenever I wasn’t in the studio, but back then, that wasn’t very often.  He shared that a certain recent song production had been finished while walking around that lake with a friend, and it occurred to me that there’s more than one reason to get out of the chair and hit the fresh air.

As engineers, producers and musicians, most of us spend the majority of our time squirreled away in dark clubs and darker studios.  Night is the preferred (or necessary) time of work for most musicians, and isolation from the world is necessary both acoustically and emotionally.  This isn’t bad, but we spend our energy mercilessly in the studio – people who have never mixed a record have no idea how much physical energy it takes.  That’s reason one to get outside.  It can kill a person to sit in front of a mix desk or a computer all the time and never see the light.  Sitting has even been called the new smoking.  So, it’s important to get up, leave the room, leave the building, and go outside.  Take a walk, get some more serious exercise, or just look at something natural.

My Twitter friend pointed out reason two with his story about the song.  Inspiration comes from “refilling the well” (to paraphrase Julia Cameron), and if you sit too long in your own production, you can run out of perspective and ideas.  Personally, I’ll probably never write a lyric about a pristine lake; that would be boring to me.  But refilling the well is more about replenishing energy than direct and literal inspiration.  Sometimes a walk around the lake just causes that last, elusive idea to come.

In this case, getting outside is both literal and metaphorical.  We need to get outside of our heads, outside of the room, and outside of our own thinking.  We need an outside perspective.  That’s why there are mix notes.  That’s why great mixers clear out the control room.  There needs to be someone who wasn’t there the whole time to come in toward the end and give an outside perspective.  Sometimes it may even behoove us to hire an outside mixer, producer or player, or take a project to an outside studio.

Reason three:  Ears need breaks.  Listening fatigue causes poor sonic judgement and especially if things are loud, ears can get damaged over time.  Getting away from the sound at regular intervals is as important as keeping volumes reasonable and wearing ear protection.  If you live in Manhattan, going outside may not help you here, but as I recall, it’s only about a 5 minute walk from Hell’s Kitchen to Central Park, so maybe all is not lost for you New Yorkers!

If health isn’t your bag, and inspiration is coming out your pores at all times no matter what, maybe reason four is enough to get you outside:  You can’t get famous if you never meet anybody.  One could argue that you can use the internet for that, but we all know that meeting people face to face is so much more powerful.  Getting outside in this case just means out of your house, and you still may end up constantly in dark clubs, or once you achieve this fame, deep in penthouse suites drinking chardonnay and eating thousand dollar fish guts, but if you want that to last, I refer you to previous paragraphs regarding health.

I for one have changed the way I do business and make music.  I get up in the morning now, I keep the windows and doors open 95% of the time, and I built my new office/studio in the sunniest room in the house.  I never book a session longer than four hours (usually it’s two) and I stand up and walk out the front door repeatedly throughout the day. All-nighters are a thing of the past now, as is the romance of the dungeon studio.

For me, it’s more than just nature, sunshine and lakes, and it’s more than literally going outdoors.  For me, it’s about work/life balance, something that people in other professions enjoy, but it seems that musicians usually don’t.  For me, it’s about treating my dream job as WORK, and not a hobby, which means, I get to have a life outside of work/music.  We don’t HAVE to be squirreled away all the time and miss the beautiful, varied, colorful things that live out THERE, not in HERE, just because we make music.

I may not ever meet my Twitter friend by the lake, but I’m glad he reminded me to take it outside.  If you need me the rest of today, that’s where I’ll be.

I’m a vocalist, pianist, producer, engineer and – as you can see – writer. I’m currently outside, but when I come in, you can find me at @AaronJTrumm on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.

Feeding Back

June 8, 2021 by Aaron
Audio Instruction, Instructional Stuff, Music Business, Music Thoughts, Rants, Randomness, Published Work, Recording Magazine
aaron j. trumm, aaron trumm, do it yourself recording, get better at making music, improve my music, music critique, nquit music, recording magazine

Improving your tracks by soliciting critique

This article first appeared in Recording Magazine. I reprint it here with permission, and I encourage you to subscribe to that publication, as they are a stand up bunch of folk!

Normally in the audio world we try to eliminate feedback.  Nobody wants that high-pitched caterwauling ruining an otherwise perfect performance.  That may also be how you feel about listening to someone’s opinion about your music, but the truth is outside opinions can be incredibly helpful.

Even if your goal isn’t a wildly successful professional career, getting an outside opinion or five can help you see what you’re missing in a way that time away from a track cannot.  If you’re willing to take on the challenge, you can use these other opinions to dramatically improve your work.  Just like a writer rarely submits a first draft to a publisher, a great song is hardly ever the first version.  In fact, most great productions go through multiple iterations and some final versions are barely recognizable as the same song as version one.

That all said, there’s an art to soliciting feedback and using it wisely to improve a track.  But done right, the circle of feedback, revision, feedback, revision is one of the most powerful tools at our disposal in the never-ending quest to sound better.

An Ever-Widening Circle

The first question that’ll come up when you’re ready to get critique is who to ask.  Sure, you can ask just about anyone and if you know how to listen, every opinion will have value.  But in practice you’ll probably want to strategize, both for time’s sake and for your own sanity.  A good plan of action employed by many is the ever-widening circle approach.

The Inner Sanctum

Start with your closest and most trusted associates; the people who already believe in you, think you’re great, and you feel safe showing bad work to.  This group may be the four or five members of your band, it may be the 2 collaborators on a long-distance project, or it may be your mother and your girlfriend.

This is the group you can show sketches to, to start to get an idea if a song is even worth your time to produce.  This group is also well situated to feedback on multiple versions of a song and help as the song grows from an itty-bitty baby mp3 demo into a full-fledged mix.  It’s helpful if one of this inner circle is an expert, but it’s equally helpful if at least one is not.  Most important, they should understand you and your goals, and they should feel safe to be honest.  This should not be a group that will say everything you do is great.  That’s not helpful.  They should, rather, know how great you CAN be, and hold you to that standard.

First Steps Into The World

Once your track starts to grow legs, you should start widening your circle.  Seek out trusted industry contacts, other musicians and strangers who aren’t the general public.  A good place to find new people at this stage are Facebook groups meant for production feedback.  It’s helpful to be part of a few semi-private industry groups like MixMe where people bounce ideas and learn from each other.

The key at this stage is to present as finished a mix as you can, and then be willing to go back and change it.  Luckily, these are not the days of 12-hour analog mix sessions that can never be recreated.  Do a “save as” and create a new DAW file so you can implement changes without losing the older versions.  If you ARE working in an all analog environment, you may consider having more people involved earlier in the process, and more people in the building when you mix.

It can be a hard pill to swallow to work hard on getting something to “finished” and then soliciting feedback, but once you start to involve strangers you want to put your best foot forward.

At this point, you’re still probably looking for general feedback, but you may start focusing down, maybe by seeking feedback from mix engineers on the mix, and songwriting experts on the song writing.  Make sure to take notes on everything you hear good and bad, and don’t put your own filter on.  If possible, try to implement every piece of feedback you get unless two people directly contradict each other.  In that case, you’re the boss so use your veto power.

Going Semi-Public

Once you’ve solicited feedback from some fellow producers and extra friends and done a few more iterations, you’re probably feeling confident about the track.  Now’s the time to get a little more public, and you can do this in a number of ways.

You could share the track on social media and wait for feedback.  If you do it this way, it’s unlikely anyone will say anything bad to you, but you’ll be able to gauge how well the track is moving people by how extreme their responses are.  If you get 3 comments on a Facebook post that say “neat.  Great track, man,” that’s not a great response.  It means people are being polite.  If you get 43 comments that say “holy CRAP I love this SOOOOO much where can I download it PLEASE?” that’s a great response.

That’s a decent way to go about it, but in truth, it’s hard to get people to listen to songs on social media (a subject for a whole other article).  If you’re really looking to test the track’s mettle, you may start reaching out to gatekeepers or professionals whose job is to critique songs.  If you’re a Taxi member you can submit for feedback or find a listing to submit to and see what the screener says about the track.  If the track gets accepted great, but you don’t really care yet, you’re just looking for feedback.

Another option is to submit your track to a service like Audiu, AudioKite (now a part of ReverbNation) or Fluence and read the reports.  The feedback may or may not be specific enough for you, and your skin needs to be thick at this point, but the powerful part is these are not people that are trying to please you, and they’re anonymous. 

At this point, it may be even harder than before to want to change things, because you’ll have worked hard, but if you’re willing, you can make your track just that much better.  Just beware of one thing:  context is decisive.  That means that inside the context of you seeking “coaching”, you will probably never impress these people.  Their job is to look for what’s wrong, so simply use what they say to polish up the track, and leave the accolades to your fans.

The Art Of Solicitation

Once you have an idea about who to ask, how do you ask?  As is usual in any business interaction, the first rule is be civil, polite and humble.  Be specific about what you need feedback on, and never ever answer back.  When receiving feedback, especially face to face, it’s never helpful to defend a decision.  This leaves people feeling unsafe to really open up, which will leave you in the dark about what they really think.  Instead, simply nod, write down the note, and say thank you.

If you’re simply looking for people’s first responses, then you can simply ask “what do you think of this”, but as you move forward, you’ll probably have specific questions, like whether the mix is translating or if the lyrics seem trite.  It’s good to let people know if the mix is just a rough and you’re looking for songwriting, or if the arrangement is set in stone, and you’re just looking for opinions on the bass.  Whatever it is, being specific helps people narrow in on what you need and saves time and energy.

That said, it can be quite telling to NOT mention a particular problem you’re worried about.  See if people notice it without you mentioning it.  That’s a tell tale sign that your instinct was right and you need a change.

Of course, if you’re asking other musicians for feedback, be sure to be willing to help them on their tracks too!  On most Facebook groups, the common etiquette is to feedback on other people’s work for a while before making your ask.  People will be more familiar with you and feel more comfortable helping you.

Above all, be great with people, and receive all criticism with gratitude.

Giving Feedback

Since you’ll be reciprocating by helping people, you may want to think about how to give feedback in a way that creates a good relationship while still actually helping your fellow musicians grow.

The same basic rules apply.  Be kind and courteous, and treat people with respect, even if they are brand new.  Never pan work outright, and never criticize the person.  A good rule of thumb when giving feedback is to assume everyone is a professional who knows what they’re doing.  This means only providing feedback when asked, sticking to what’s asked for, and never talking down to people, even if they’re way newer than you.

You also don’t want to blow smoke.  Just as with your work, it’s patronizing and unhelpful to simply say “yeah!  Great stuff!” unless your mind is so blown that you can find nothing to improve.  In that case, you will probably come up with something more anyway.  By the same token, focusing entirely on a plethora of mistakes can be damaging and equally unhelpful.

So a good method to use is what management technique calls “the sandwich method”.  This method is normally used to surreptitiously give negative feedback to employees, but when critiquing music can be the perfect approach.  It goes like this:  start with something positive, lead to something that could be improved, and end with something positive.

The key to the sandwich method NOT being disingenuous and manipulating is to really MEAN the positive parts.  Find something that you truly like or love about the song, and lead with that.  From there, move into the thing that you noticed that you think could be improved.  Be specific, and offer an idea for something else to do.  Then end with more positivity.  That could be “great work!” or “can’t wait to hear the next version”, or even another specific thing.

For example, maybe your friend Joe asks you for general feedback on a song and the first thing you notice is a very muddy low end.  Since that’s the first thing you noticed, you should listen again, and look for what you like.  On second listen, you notice how great the songwriting is.  So your feedback might go something like:

“Hey Joe!  Wow this song is so well written.  Amazing lyrics!  I’m hearing some mud in the low end which obscures a couple lyrics, so I might try to carve out some 100hz in the bass and kick drum, and maybe look for other cuts in some of the ‘mud’ frequencies like 200 and 400-500hz.  I’d love to hear it at that point.  Really digging this one, can’t wait for the finished master!”

The best part about establishing this method of feedback is that if you boost people up while still actually helping them improve, they’ll do the same for you!

Go Around Again

Once you’ve got some good critique and a bunch of notes, obviously you’ll want to implement it.  You’ll probably want to save a new DAW session file, and you may even want to make a couple of different versions at this point.  Perhaps you’re not decided between one person’s idea that you make a song longer and another that you make it shorter.  You can do a couple of versions and let them shoot it out.  Or you may just make that executive decision.  Either way, once you’ve implemented as much of the feedback as you can, go back around the ever-widening circle until you’re getting very little critique, and most importantly you feel satisfied and confident.

When you’re at that point, it’s time to put the song into the world, and after that don’t ask for feedback, because that sets up the context that the song is not finished.  When you release to the general public simply project confidence and excitement.  You’ll still get some unsolicited critique, and that’s ok.  Carry that feedback forward and let it inform your next productions, and where and who you market the finished song to.

Wherever that leads you, you will find that vetting your work will give you confidence, better tracks and a lot more opportunity to interact with and work with people of like mind.

Here’s to feedback we want, and may you never hear the other kind of dreaded squeal again.

I’m a producer, singer and emcee who could have used some more vetting early on.  Nevertheless, I’m now open to conversation on social media @AaronJTrumm.

Latest Posts

  • Mix Fu:
  • Making money in music is scary. Subscriptions may help.
  • Signal Flow Part 2
  • What Is Quantizing and How Do I Use It
  • Cull the Herd

Archives

  • May 2022
  • February 2022
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2018
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • November 2006

Follow

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2022 © Copyright @ NQuit Music –  All Rights Reserved – Website by nquit.com